Tracking Red State Challenges to Immigrant Inclusive Policies
Ever since President Biden took office, red states have been co-opting the legal system in efforts to continue anti-immigrant Trump policies.
This site follows these cases through the court system and houses important filings, news coverage, and advocacy tools to advance a more humane, moral and dignified immigration system.
Latest Updates
-
Biden v. Texas (TX RMX) - Supreme CourtMandatory Detention, MPP/RMX (Remain in Mexico), Parole06/30/2022-Opinion Reversing & Remanding (PDF at this link)On February 18, 2022, the Supreme Court granted the Biden Administration's request to review the decision of the Fifth Circuit holding that the federal government must restart and maintain the "Remain in Mexico" (“RMX”) program (also referred to as the "Migrant Protection Protocols," or MPP), a...Read more
-
Arizona v. CDC (AZ Title 42 Termination) - Court of AppealsCOVID, Title 4206/16/2022-Order Denying ILL’s Motion to Stay Nationwide Injunction (PDF)This is an appeal of a district court’s order preliminarily enjoining (blocking) the Biden Administration’s attempt to end the Title 42 expulsion policy, under which most migrants at the southern border seeking asylum have been summarily expelled back to Mexico, ostensibly to prevent the spread of...Read more
-
Texas v. USA (TX ICE Priorities) - District CourtMandatory Detention, Parole, Prosecutorial Discretion, ICE06/14/2022-Order Extending Stay (PDF)In April 2021, Texas and Louisiana sued the Biden Administration over immigration enforcement guidance that set out criteria and guidelines for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to consider when prioritizing cases for enforcement and deportation (e.g. whether an individual is a national...Read more
Litigation Tracker
-
Alabama v. Mayorkas - District Court
Mandatory DetentionProsecutorial DiscretionICEIn April 2022, Alabama, Florida, and Georgia sued the Biden Administration over immigration enforcement guidance, issued in September 2021, that set out criteria and guidelines for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to consider when prioritizing cases for enforcement and deportation (e.g...Read more -
Arizona v. Biden - Court of Appeals
Mandatory DetentionProsecutorial DiscretionICEThis is an appeal by the federal government of the March 22, 2022 decision of a trial court preliminarily enjoining (blocking) guidance the Biden Administration issued in September 2021 for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to consider when prioritizing cases for enforcement and deportation...Read more -
Arizona v. Biden - District Court
Mandatory DetentionProsecutorial DiscretionICEIn November 2021, Arizona, Montana, and Ohio sued the Biden Administration regarding immigration enforcement guidance, issued in September 2021, for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to consider when prioritizing cases for enforcement and deportation (e.g., whether an individual is a...Read more -
Arizona v. DHS (AZ ICE Priorities - District Court)
Mandatory DetentionParoleProsecutorial DiscretionICEIn early 2021, Arizona and Montana sued the Biden Administration regarding immigration enforcement guidance, issued in January and February 2021, for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to consider when prioritizing cases for enforcement and deportation (e.g. whether an individual is a...Read more -
Arizona v. DHS (AZ ICE Priorities) - Court of Appeals
Mandatory DetentionParoleProsecutorial DiscretionICEThis was an appeal by the States of Arizona and Montana of a district court order dismissing their claims against immigration enforcement guidance, issued in January and February 2021, for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to consider when prioritizing cases for enforcement and deportation...Read more -
Arizona v. Mayorkas (AZ Border Wall) - Court of Appeals
Border WallCOVIDMandatory DetentionMPP/RMX (Remain in Mexico)ParoleTitle 42Prosecutorial DiscretionICEThis is an appeal in a case where Arizona challenges at least five different immigration-related policies of the Biden administration, principally on the ground that they allegedly violate an environmental law. Arizona’s main contention is that since the various policies could result in an increase...Read more
Image
TAKE ACTION
Join us in demanding an end to Remain in Mexico.
