Immigration Litigation Tracker
[NOTE: Archived in 2025]
This site follows these cases through the court system and houses important filings, news coverage, and advocacy tools to advance a more humane and dignified immigration system.
Jump to tracker
Latest Updates
-
PCUN v. Noem (Sensitive Locations)Sensitive Locations, JAC Case01/22/2026-Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (PDF)A coalition of five different organizational plaintiffs, including a labor union and a membership organization comprising over 800 congregations in the City and County of San Francisco, filed suit to challenge DHS’s rescission of the so-called “sensitive locations” memo, which had codified long...Read more
-
CLSEPA v. HHS - Court of Appeals (Preliminary Injunction Appeal)JAC Case, Children/Youth10/10/2025-Order Denying Petition for Rehearing En Banc (PDF)The federal government has appealed a district court’s preliminary injunction blocking the government from withdrawing funding for the legal representation of unaccompanied children–representation that the government is required to fund “to the greatest extent practicable” by the Trafficking Victims...Read more
-
Svitlana Doe v. Noem (Humanitarian Parole) - Court of AppealsParole, JAC Case09/12/2025-Order Vacating District Court Order and Remanding (PDF)The federal government has appealed an order from Judge Talwani staying (blocking from going into effect) a Federal Register Notice that would have prematurely terminated all existing authorized grants of parole under the Parole Processes for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans (CHNV) as...Read more
Litigation Tracker
-
Biden v. Texas (TX RMX) - Supreme Court
Detention/Mandatory DetentionMPP/RMX (Remain in Mexico)Parole[ARCHIVED - September 2025] On February 18, 2022, the Supreme Court granted the Biden Administration's request to review the decision of the Fifth Circuit holding that the federal government must restart and maintain the "Remain in Mexico" (“RMX”) program (also referred to as the "Migrant Protection...Read more -
Brnovich v. Biden (AZ Detention) - District Court
Detention/Mandatory DetentionParoleThis was a suit by Arizona against the Biden Administration regarding two different sets of unrelated policies: COVID-19 vaccine mandates as to federal employees and contractors, on the one hand, and the circumstances under which asylum seekers should be detained, on the other. Arizona filed suit in...Read more -
CHIRLA v. Noem - District Court (Expedited Removal of Parole Recipients)
Expedited RemovalParoleJAC CaseThree immigrant justice membership organizations - Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA), UndocuBlack Network, and CASA - filed this lawsuit on behalf of their members who were granted parole through various humanitarian parole processes, including through the program for Cubans, Haitians...Read more -
Florida v. Mayorkas (FL Detention II) - District Court
Detention/Mandatory DetentionParoleThe State of Florida filed this case on May 10, 2023—the day before “ Title 42 ” pandemic-based border restrictions expired—to challenge a newly-issued DHS policy known as “ Parole with Conditions. ” Under that policy, some asylum seekers can be released from detention (on immigration “parole,” a...Read more -
Florida v. USA (FL Detention I) - Court of Appeals
Detention/Mandatory DetentionParoleThis is an appeal of a March 2023 decision by a district court judge in Florida to vacate (nullify) a DHS policy authorizing, in certain circumstances, the release from detention of some asylum seekers and instead monitoring them via less expensive and arguably more humane alternatives to detention...Read more -
Florida v. USA (FL Detention I) - District Court
Detention/Mandatory DetentionParoleThe State of Florida filed this case in September 2021 to challenge decades-long practices of the federal government whereby some asylum seekers are released from detention while the federal government adjudicates their claims for humanitarian protection (which often takes years). Florida claims...Read more -
Florida v. USA (FL Detention II) - Court of Appeals
Detention/Mandatory DetentionParoleThis is an appeal of a May 2023 decision by a district court judge in Florida to preliminarily enjoin (block) a DHS policy authorizing, in certain circumstances, the release from detention of some asylum seekers and instead monitoring them via less expensive and arguably more humane alternatives to...Read more -
Indiana v. Biden - District Court
Detention/Mandatory DetentionParole[ARCHIVED/CLOSED- October 2025] In this lawsuit, Indiana challenges decades-old practices of the federal government whereby some asylum seekers are released from detention while the federal government adjudicates their claims for humanitarian protection (which often takes years). Indiana claims that...Read more -
Noem v. Svitlana Doe (Humanitarian Parole) - Supreme Court
ParoleJAC CaseFollowing Judge Talwani’s April 14 order enjoining the federal government from terminating CHNV parole grants, the federal government asked the First Circuit to stay (pause) the district court’s order while the parties litigate the government’s appeal. On May 5, the First Circuit denied the...Read more -
Sileiri Doe v. DHS (CBP One Parole) - District Court
ParoleIn 2023, non-citizens seeking asylum or other immigration relief in the United States were required to use the CBP One mobile application to schedule appointments at ports of entry. After inspection, some were granted parole, which is a temporary permission to live and work in the United States...Read more -
Svitlana Doe v. Noem (Humanitarian Parole) - Court of Appeals
ParoleJAC CaseThe federal government has appealed an order from Judge Talwani staying (blocking from going into effect) a Federal Register Notice that would have prematurely terminated all existing authorized grants of parole under the Parole Processes for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans (CHNV) as...Read more -
Svitlana Doe v. Noem (Humanitarian Parole) - District Court
ParoleJAC CaseThis lawsuit is on behalf of eleven parole beneficiaries, seven parole sponsors, and organizational plaintiff Haitian Bridge Alliance, challenging the Trump administration’s actions to end so-called “categorical” humanitarian parole processes, including parole processes for Cuban, Haitians...Read more -
Texas v. Biden (TX CAM) - District Court
ParoleChildren/YouthIn January 2022, Texas (along with seven other states) filed this lawsuit challenging the Central American Minors (CAM) program. Through CAM, certain nationals of the Northern Triangle countries (El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras) who are lawfully in the United States can request, on a case-by...Read more -
Texas v. Biden (TX RMX) - Court of Appeals I
Detention/Mandatory DetentionMPP/RMX (Remain in Mexico)ParoleThis is an appeal of a district court’s order that the Biden Administration restart the "Remain in Mexico" program (also referred to as the "Migrant Protection Protocols," or MPP), a Trump-era policy requiring certain asylum seekers to be returned to Mexico and forced to wait there for the months or...Read more -
Texas v. Biden (TX RMX) - Court of Appeals II
Detention/Mandatory DetentionMPP/RMX (Remain in Mexico)ParoleThis is an appeal of a district court’s order that stayed (paused) the Biden Administration’s second attempt to end the "Remain in Mexico" program (also referred to as the "Migrant Protection Protocols," or MPP), a Trump-era policy requiring certain asylum seekers to be returned to Mexico and forced...Read more -
Texas v. Biden (TX RMX) - District Court
Detention/Mandatory DetentionMPP/RMX (Remain in Mexico)ParoleIn April 2021, Texas and Missouri sued the Biden Administration for ending a policy, created in late 2018 by the Trump Administration, under which certain asylum seekers are returned to Mexico and forced to wait there for the months or years required for the U.S. government to process their...Read more -
Texas v. DHS (KFT Parole) - District Court
ParoleThis case has a complicated history. This a challenge by 16 states (led by Texas and Idaho) to the Keeping Families Together (KFT) process created by the Biden Administration in August 2024, through which certain undocumented immigrant spouses and stepchildren of U.S. citizens can apply for “parole...Read more -
Texas v. DHS (KFT Parole) - Intervention Appeal
ParoleThis is an appeal of a district court’s refusal to let potential beneficiaries of the Keeping Families Together (KFT) parole process intervene in a lawsuit brought by 16 states challenging its legality. The KFT process was created by the Biden Administration in August 2024, and it allows certain...Read more
Image
TAKE ACTION
Defend Humanitarian Parole and Support Immigrant Justice Today!